<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Risk Of Rain	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.pentadact.com/2013-11-23-risk-of-rain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2013-11-23-risk-of-rain/</link>
	<description>We&#039;re back on a default theme because comments broke on my custom one and I don&#039;t have the energy to figure out why</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2013 03:53:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason L		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2013-11-23-risk-of-rain/#comment-501728</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2013 03:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/?p=6695#comment-501728</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[TB&#039;s Risk of Rain video is also the first place I&#039;ve seen him spell out his objections to Spelunky. It&#039;s a simple perception that I can&#039;t object to, but I do find it incomprehensible - that Spelunky, where you (for a long time) spend two minutes per level and die and learn immediately upon messing up, is wasting the player&#039;s time while Risk of Rain, where you spend about five minutes per level and can screw up your build long before being slowly whittled down, is the epitome of the roguelite.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TB&#8217;s Risk of Rain video is also the first place I&#8217;ve seen him spell out his objections to Spelunky. It&#8217;s a simple perception that I can&#8217;t object to, but I do find it incomprehensible &#8211; that Spelunky, where you (for a long time) spend two minutes per level and die and learn immediately upon messing up, is wasting the player&#8217;s time while Risk of Rain, where you spend about five minutes per level and can screw up your build long before being slowly whittled down, is the epitome of the roguelite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tubers		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2013-11-23-risk-of-rain/#comment-500346</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tubers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 15:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/?p=6695#comment-500346</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Unlocking characters is definitely too hard, especially since its one of the main draws of the game.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlocking characters is definitely too hard, especially since its one of the main draws of the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: boogieman		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2013-11-23-risk-of-rain/#comment-499215</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[boogieman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/?p=6695#comment-499215</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I suggested you play this in one of your videos and you did more than that :]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggested you play this in one of your videos and you did more than that :]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brandon		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2013-11-23-risk-of-rain/#comment-498087</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 20:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/?p=6695#comment-498087</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Pretty fair assessment of Risk of Rain.  I saw TotalBiscuit play this and him basically jerk off about it but then when I played it, I didn&#039;t like it to that degree. I got my value for what it&#039;s worth but I find it odd that there&#039;s only one character to start.  I get what they&#039;re doing with the long curve to unlock things but I don&#039;t have the patience to do so for this game.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty fair assessment of Risk of Rain.  I saw TotalBiscuit play this and him basically jerk off about it but then when I played it, I didn&#8217;t like it to that degree. I got my value for what it&#8217;s worth but I find it odd that there&#8217;s only one character to start.  I get what they&#8217;re doing with the long curve to unlock things but I don&#8217;t have the patience to do so for this game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Playing Risk Of Rain: The Engineer And The Shitty Lantern - a post on Tom Francis' blog		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2013-11-23-risk-of-rain/#comment-496671</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Playing Risk Of Rain: The Engineer And The Shitty Lantern - a post on Tom Francis' blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2013 17:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/?p=6695#comment-496671</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Here&#8217;s what Risk of Rain is like. It&#8217;s a randomised shooter thingy, and here I&#8217;m playing as one of the classes you unlock later on, the Engineer. More thoughts on why it&#8217;s good. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Here&#8217;s what Risk of Rain is like. It&#8217;s a randomised shooter thingy, and here I&#8217;m playing as one of the classes you unlock later on, the Engineer. More thoughts on why it&#8217;s good. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Duncan Wintle		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2013-11-23-risk-of-rain/#comment-495539</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duncan Wintle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2013 17:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/?p=6695#comment-495539</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No to mention the insainly good soundtrack.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No to mention the insainly good soundtrack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
