<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Film Catch-Up	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.pentadact.com/2008-08-05-film-catch-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2008-08-05-film-catch-up/</link>
	<description>We&#039;re back on a default theme because comments broke on my custom one and I don&#039;t have the energy to figure out why</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:16:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason L		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2008-08-05-film-catch-up/#comment-141089</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/index.php/2008-08-05-film-catch-up#comment-141089</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m the best part of a year behind on this, apparently, but... More Futurama this summer! Without bizarre pastiche film/episode writing restrictions! Oplease oplease opleasebegood...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m the best part of a year behind on this, apparently, but&#8230; More Futurama this summer! Without bizarre pastiche film/episode writing restrictions! Oplease oplease opleasebegood&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: J-Man		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2008-08-05-film-catch-up/#comment-38513</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J-Man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/index.php/2008-08-05-film-catch-up#comment-38513</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My thoughts on Madagascar 2 (subtle, eh?):

http://existentialistgamer.wordpress.com/2008/11/16/madagascar-2/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thoughts on Madagascar 2 (subtle, eh?):</p>
<p><a href="http://existentialistgamer.wordpress.com/2008/11/16/madagascar-2/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://existentialistgamer.wordpress.com/2008/11/16/madagascar-2/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Fat Zombie		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2008-08-05-film-catch-up/#comment-32832</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fat Zombie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/index.php/2008-08-05-film-catch-up#comment-32832</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I too noticed this dissonance between the Joker&#039;s insistence that he doesn&#039;t plan, and his amazingly detailed and clever plots. But, then again, doesn&#039;t he also lie about the origin of his scars?
It could be that he simply tells Dent this in his efforts to push him over the edge. And all the stuff Doctor Disaster said.

Anyway, awesome movie. If simply just for the Pencil Trick.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too noticed this dissonance between the Joker&#8217;s insistence that he doesn&#8217;t plan, and his amazingly detailed and clever plots. But, then again, doesn&#8217;t he also lie about the origin of his scars?<br />
It could be that he simply tells Dent this in his efforts to push him over the edge. And all the stuff Doctor Disaster said.</p>
<p>Anyway, awesome movie. If simply just for the Pencil Trick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DoctorDisaster		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2008-08-05-film-catch-up/#comment-32819</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DoctorDisaster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/index.php/2008-08-05-film-catch-up#comment-32819</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I like this depiction of the Joker for the same reasons everyone else here seems to dislike it. That dissonance you&#039;re talking about was definitely there, and I was conscious of it while I was watching the movie, but I instinctively accepted it as part of the characterization. Scarecrow is about fear, Dent is about heroism, but Joker isn&#039;t really used as a theme villain. Instead, he&#039;s presented as a sort of mythological nemesis. He&#039;s the fundamental opposite of Batman. Think about the &quot;they&#039;re cheap&quot; scene; those talkative moments about his past; his continually expanding roster of henchmen versus the one-man-army approach. So where Bats acts with a single-minded purpose that borders on obsessive insanity, Joker&#039;s MO is disjointed, schizophrenic, and impossible to square even with itself.

Only adding to the layers of dissonance is the fact that while Wayne&#039;s anti-crime fervor masks a conflicted mess of motivations (revenge for his parents, love for Rachel, the &#039;greater good&#039; that drives the Dent thing, the &#039;any means necessary&#039; of the stupid cell phone thing, etc etc), Joker&#039;s haphazard approach masks a single central purpose: to fuck with the Bat. He builds up power so that he can go to war with Batman; he wants to burn Gotham because Batman wants to save it; he wants to prove people are evil because Batman wants them to be good. As was hinted at the end of the last movie, Joker&#039;s entire existence is a reaction against Batman&#039;s. I&#039;m a total sucker for that mythic angle and I feel like the dissonance in his depiction is an intentional way to reinforce that.

On the other hand, I&#039;ll agree the Dent thing was telegraphed a little too insistently. And the aforementioned stupid cell phone thing was utterly contrived. But at the end of the day, nothing in Dark Knight could even begin to compare to the colossal stupidity of &quot;microwave the city to boil the water to burst the pipes to release the gas to make people hallucinate to make everyone kill each other BUT at least they&#039;ll suffer no ill effects from being MICROWAVED, amirite???&quot;

Spoiler alert?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this depiction of the Joker for the same reasons everyone else here seems to dislike it. That dissonance you&#8217;re talking about was definitely there, and I was conscious of it while I was watching the movie, but I instinctively accepted it as part of the characterization. Scarecrow is about fear, Dent is about heroism, but Joker isn&#8217;t really used as a theme villain. Instead, he&#8217;s presented as a sort of mythological nemesis. He&#8217;s the fundamental opposite of Batman. Think about the &#8220;they&#8217;re cheap&#8221; scene; those talkative moments about his past; his continually expanding roster of henchmen versus the one-man-army approach. So where Bats acts with a single-minded purpose that borders on obsessive insanity, Joker&#8217;s MO is disjointed, schizophrenic, and impossible to square even with itself.</p>
<p>Only adding to the layers of dissonance is the fact that while Wayne&#8217;s anti-crime fervor masks a conflicted mess of motivations (revenge for his parents, love for Rachel, the &#8216;greater good&#8217; that drives the Dent thing, the &#8216;any means necessary&#8217; of the stupid cell phone thing, etc etc), Joker&#8217;s haphazard approach masks a single central purpose: to fuck with the Bat. He builds up power so that he can go to war with Batman; he wants to burn Gotham because Batman wants to save it; he wants to prove people are evil because Batman wants them to be good. As was hinted at the end of the last movie, Joker&#8217;s entire existence is a reaction against Batman&#8217;s. I&#8217;m a total sucker for that mythic angle and I feel like the dissonance in his depiction is an intentional way to reinforce that.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I&#8217;ll agree the Dent thing was telegraphed a little too insistently. And the aforementioned stupid cell phone thing was utterly contrived. But at the end of the day, nothing in Dark Knight could even begin to compare to the colossal stupidity of &#8220;microwave the city to boil the water to burst the pipes to release the gas to make people hallucinate to make everyone kill each other BUT at least they&#8217;ll suffer no ill effects from being MICROWAVED, amirite???&#8221;</p>
<p>Spoiler alert?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: J-man		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2008-08-05-film-catch-up/#comment-32781</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J-man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/index.php/2008-08-05-film-catch-up#comment-32781</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Personally, I really liked Beast with a Billion Backs, but I can see that it was solely aimed at fans, such as me. I thought Wall-E was also good and I completely agree with you about &#039;Incredibles.

Anyway, I guess this means I&#039;ll have to go see in Bruges. Damn you Tom Francis, with your good reviews!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I really liked Beast with a Billion Backs, but I can see that it was solely aimed at fans, such as me. I thought Wall-E was also good and I completely agree with you about &#8216;Incredibles.</p>
<p>Anyway, I guess this means I&#8217;ll have to go see in Bruges. Damn you Tom Francis, with your good reviews!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason L		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2008-08-05-film-catch-up/#comment-32765</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/index.php/2008-08-05-film-catch-up#comment-32765</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mr. Brit: That&#039;s cynical and therefore accurate as far as it goes, but cavalierly (deliberately?) ignores the good films whose coattails the bad ones are riding. If there weren&#039;t a tremendous resurgence going on, there wouldn&#039;t have been a genre for not one but two terrible Fantastic Four movies to parasitise.

My friend&#039;s &#039;a lot to live up to&#039; was actually in reference to my passing along a link to the Watchmen trailer, so now it&#039;s been mentioned I may as well comment on that. There&#039;s a lot that&#039;s bad about the original. There are a lot of changes so far that make me uneasy. There&#039;s just &lt;i&gt;no way&lt;/i&gt; it could be any good. But! If you look at the trailer, there are lots of faithful touches and stylistic decisions which would have been much easier to throw away. It makes me think that the people who are making the film actually like the source and want to remain faithful to it. My prognostication: It won&#039;t be any good, but it might still be great.

Chris: For me, WALL-E&#039;s Message really refined itself on second and subsequent viewings. On first sight it presents as OMGLOLufatties, but even after I&#039;d gone in expecting that and seen it, on second viewing it suddenly flipped in my mind to something like &#039;do real things&#039; or &#039;think about what&#039;s important&#039;. I don&#039;t know why my reading changed. I wasn&#039;t trying to &#039;fix&#039; anything in my head - I was fine with the film - but it has made it much more pleasant nonetheless. On the other hand, Message or no, if the joyful, wistful romance doesn&#039;t grab your stony heart there&#039;s no reason to watch the rest. It is truly the heart of the film.

I agree that Ratatouille lacks a certain something. I enjoyed watching it, but haven&#039;t since. It&#039;s a pity, since there&#039;s nothing &lt;i&gt;wrong&lt;/i&gt; with it and I think Anton Ego&#039;s one of the more enjoyable characters in Pixar&#039;s history.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Brit: That&#8217;s cynical and therefore accurate as far as it goes, but cavalierly (deliberately?) ignores the good films whose coattails the bad ones are riding. If there weren&#8217;t a tremendous resurgence going on, there wouldn&#8217;t have been a genre for not one but two terrible Fantastic Four movies to parasitise.</p>
<p>My friend&#8217;s &#8216;a lot to live up to&#8217; was actually in reference to my passing along a link to the Watchmen trailer, so now it&#8217;s been mentioned I may as well comment on that. There&#8217;s a lot that&#8217;s bad about the original. There are a lot of changes so far that make me uneasy. There&#8217;s just <i>no way</i> it could be any good. But! If you look at the trailer, there are lots of faithful touches and stylistic decisions which would have been much easier to throw away. It makes me think that the people who are making the film actually like the source and want to remain faithful to it. My prognostication: It won&#8217;t be any good, but it might still be great.</p>
<p>Chris: For me, WALL-E&#8217;s Message really refined itself on second and subsequent viewings. On first sight it presents as OMGLOLufatties, but even after I&#8217;d gone in expecting that and seen it, on second viewing it suddenly flipped in my mind to something like &#8216;do real things&#8217; or &#8216;think about what&#8217;s important&#8217;. I don&#8217;t know why my reading changed. I wasn&#8217;t trying to &#8216;fix&#8217; anything in my head &#8211; I was fine with the film &#8211; but it has made it much more pleasant nonetheless. On the other hand, Message or no, if the joyful, wistful romance doesn&#8217;t grab your stony heart there&#8217;s no reason to watch the rest. It is truly the heart of the film.</p>
<p>I agree that Ratatouille lacks a certain something. I enjoyed watching it, but haven&#8217;t since. It&#8217;s a pity, since there&#8217;s nothing <i>wrong</i> with it and I think Anton Ego&#8217;s one of the more enjoyable characters in Pixar&#8217;s history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mr. Brit		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2008-08-05-film-catch-up/#comment-32764</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Brit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/index.php/2008-08-05-film-catch-up#comment-32764</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just found out that a Alan Moore&#039;s &#039;Watchmen&#039; is getting a film adaption! Also a &#039;Spawn&#039; film is in pre-production! A Flash movie would be good as well....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just found out that a Alan Moore&#8217;s &#8216;Watchmen&#8217; is getting a film adaption! Also a &#8216;Spawn&#8217; film is in pre-production! A Flash movie would be good as well&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mr. Brit		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2008-08-05-film-catch-up/#comment-32763</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Brit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/index.php/2008-08-05-film-catch-up#comment-32763</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I never bought into this superhero revival thing, the films tend to be cliched messes that butcher a lot of their characters. I thought the Joker was done well but I didn&#039;t like scarecrow. Venom (Spiderman 3) was a mess and Fnatastic Four is just terrible. I&#039;d prefer some of the more obscure heroes. A remake of League of Extraordinary Gentlemen that held truer to the original comics would be excellent. I think it&#039;s depressing that an animated superhero film can surpass the greats on the big screen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never bought into this superhero revival thing, the films tend to be cliched messes that butcher a lot of their characters. I thought the Joker was done well but I didn&#8217;t like scarecrow. Venom (Spiderman 3) was a mess and Fnatastic Four is just terrible. I&#8217;d prefer some of the more obscure heroes. A remake of League of Extraordinary Gentlemen that held truer to the original comics would be excellent. I think it&#8217;s depressing that an animated superhero film can surpass the greats on the big screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris Livingston		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2008-08-05-film-catch-up/#comment-32760</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Livingston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 14:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/index.php/2008-08-05-film-catch-up#comment-32760</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yay!  Someone else saw In Bruges!  I&#039;ve been recommending it to everyone.  We recently rented it and absolutely loved it.  The last twenty minutes were a bit heavy with coincidences, but overall it&#039;s most enjoyable film I&#039;ve seen in probably a few years.  Great performances all around.  And I love that the crime boss has to go to a special dealer just to get a gun, instead of films set in America, where he&#039;d have twin rocket-launching chainguns in his coat closet.

Honestly, Pixar&#039;s last couple films look amazing but haven&#039;t captured me much otherwise.  I thought the one with the rat chef was boring (didn&#039;t even finish watching it) and the WALL-E story was cute but I never gave it a second thought after leaving the theater, not even about the incredibly subtle and easy to miss message that we&#039;re overweight and lazy (O RLY?!?!?!).  The Incredibles is still my favorite by far.

I liked Dark Knight a lot and would even go see it again in the theater if it wasn&#039;t so long.  I think they could have saved Two Face&#039;s revenge for the next movie.

I don&#039;t remember a whole lot about the second Futurama movie, which I guess isn&#039;t much of an endorsement. Definitely the first was superior and had a much more enjoyable story.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay!  Someone else saw In Bruges!  I&#8217;ve been recommending it to everyone.  We recently rented it and absolutely loved it.  The last twenty minutes were a bit heavy with coincidences, but overall it&#8217;s most enjoyable film I&#8217;ve seen in probably a few years.  Great performances all around.  And I love that the crime boss has to go to a special dealer just to get a gun, instead of films set in America, where he&#8217;d have twin rocket-launching chainguns in his coat closet.</p>
<p>Honestly, Pixar&#8217;s last couple films look amazing but haven&#8217;t captured me much otherwise.  I thought the one with the rat chef was boring (didn&#8217;t even finish watching it) and the WALL-E story was cute but I never gave it a second thought after leaving the theater, not even about the incredibly subtle and easy to miss message that we&#8217;re overweight and lazy (O RLY?!?!?!).  The Incredibles is still my favorite by far.</p>
<p>I liked Dark Knight a lot and would even go see it again in the theater if it wasn&#8217;t so long.  I think they could have saved Two Face&#8217;s revenge for the next movie.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t remember a whole lot about the second Futurama movie, which I guess isn&#8217;t much of an endorsement. Definitely the first was superior and had a much more enjoyable story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason L		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2008-08-05-film-catch-up/#comment-32758</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/index.php/2008-08-05-film-catch-up#comment-32758</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#039;Freeman&#039;s&#039;, there. I am not on a first-name basis with Morgan Freeman.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Freeman&#8217;s&#8217;, there. I am not on a first-name basis with Morgan Freeman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason L		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2008-08-05-film-catch-up/#comment-32756</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/index.php/2008-08-05-film-catch-up#comment-32756</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Pretty much echoed here. I too like Dark Knight, though I too use the word &#039;like&#039;, and I too didn&#039;t like Batman Begins much because...training in a nihilist mountain philosopher ninja monastery with flipping out and swords and explosive barrels in the living quarters? &lt;i&gt;Really?&lt;/i&gt; But then I already got Batman. I don&#039;t understand the seismic ticket sales, multiple viewings and rapturous reviews for Dark Knight. I got an email from a friend saying that after seeing Dark Knight other superhero movies have a lot to live up to. Well they do - it&#039;s a superhero renaissance - but that&#039;s thanks to Hellboy, Iron Man, The Incredibles...

I picked up the &#039;man with a plan&#039; dissonance as well, and the other thing that bugged me is that at least twice the Joker tells Batman that he&#039;s not trying to prove that people are inherently evil, he just &#039;wants to see everything burn&#039;. The former is obviously true and the latter false, otherwise he&#039;d just be bombing places instead of unsing his psychic powers of prediction to force people into doing evil. Now obviously, nearly everything he says to anyone in the film is a lie or misinformation, but in these scenes he&#039;s played and filmed as if he&#039;s really trying to be understood. He seems almost indignant at the misunderstanding, and not in a &#039;doth protest too much&#039; way.

I was laughing a little during the last scene. &#039;I&#039;m glad you asked what&#039;s going on son, because it oh-so-conveniently lets you stand in for Joe Sixpack who&#039;s already forgotten the other six times we philosophised about the dark knight/white knight dichotomy and Gotham&#039;s need for a symbol of hope. You see, we just discussed in front of you how we were going to have Batman take the fall for Dent&#039;s murders because we needed Dent as a symbol. Then we watched Batman running away from my police force, taking the fall for Dent&#039;s murders because we need Dent as a symbol. And now you&#039;ve asked why the police are chasing Batman. The police are chasing Batman because we&#039;re going to have Batman take the fall because we need Dent as a symbol. Do you understand son?&#039;

Anyway, I criticise because I love, well, like. Oldman&#039;s Gordon and Morgan&#039;s Fox continue to be marvelous, the &#039;blackmail Batman&#039; and &#039;billionaire absconds with ballet troupe&#039; scenes are hilarious, and the Joker is if not consistent or properly written then at least inventively monstrous.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty much echoed here. I too like Dark Knight, though I too use the word &#8216;like&#8217;, and I too didn&#8217;t like Batman Begins much because&#8230;training in a nihilist mountain philosopher ninja monastery with flipping out and swords and explosive barrels in the living quarters? <i>Really?</i> But then I already got Batman. I don&#8217;t understand the seismic ticket sales, multiple viewings and rapturous reviews for Dark Knight. I got an email from a friend saying that after seeing Dark Knight other superhero movies have a lot to live up to. Well they do &#8211; it&#8217;s a superhero renaissance &#8211; but that&#8217;s thanks to Hellboy, Iron Man, The Incredibles&#8230;</p>
<p>I picked up the &#8216;man with a plan&#8217; dissonance as well, and the other thing that bugged me is that at least twice the Joker tells Batman that he&#8217;s not trying to prove that people are inherently evil, he just &#8216;wants to see everything burn&#8217;. The former is obviously true and the latter false, otherwise he&#8217;d just be bombing places instead of unsing his psychic powers of prediction to force people into doing evil. Now obviously, nearly everything he says to anyone in the film is a lie or misinformation, but in these scenes he&#8217;s played and filmed as if he&#8217;s really trying to be understood. He seems almost indignant at the misunderstanding, and not in a &#8216;doth protest too much&#8217; way.</p>
<p>I was laughing a little during the last scene. &#8216;I&#8217;m glad you asked what&#8217;s going on son, because it oh-so-conveniently lets you stand in for Joe Sixpack who&#8217;s already forgotten the other six times we philosophised about the dark knight/white knight dichotomy and Gotham&#8217;s need for a symbol of hope. You see, we just discussed in front of you how we were going to have Batman take the fall for Dent&#8217;s murders because we needed Dent as a symbol. Then we watched Batman running away from my police force, taking the fall for Dent&#8217;s murders because we need Dent as a symbol. And now you&#8217;ve asked why the police are chasing Batman. The police are chasing Batman because we&#8217;re going to have Batman take the fall because we need Dent as a symbol. Do you understand son?&#8217;</p>
<p>Anyway, I criticise because I love, well, like. Oldman&#8217;s Gordon and Morgan&#8217;s Fox continue to be marvelous, the &#8216;blackmail Batman&#8217; and &#8216;billionaire absconds with ballet troupe&#8217; scenes are hilarious, and the Joker is if not consistent or properly written then at least inventively monstrous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Camfield		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2008-08-05-film-catch-up/#comment-32753</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Camfield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/index.php/2008-08-05-film-catch-up#comment-32753</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[May contain Batman spoilers.

I liked the Dark Knight, and I was really taken with the idea of living in a city where a guy forces the population to get involved in big ethical questions, a kind of macro (if that&#039;s the right word) version of the Saw movie baddie.

I didn&#039;t like the original, I thought it was a bit laboured with all the umming and aahing about becoming a vigilante, and then the ridiculousness of being trained in the mountains, with swords and everything. I think Year One worked better as a slow movement from learning judo, wearing a scar as a disguise and taking it to the streets, then going full on Batman mental and taking on the mob.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May contain Batman spoilers.</p>
<p>I liked the Dark Knight, and I was really taken with the idea of living in a city where a guy forces the population to get involved in big ethical questions, a kind of macro (if that&#8217;s the right word) version of the Saw movie baddie.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t like the original, I thought it was a bit laboured with all the umming and aahing about becoming a vigilante, and then the ridiculousness of being trained in the mountains, with swords and everything. I think Year One worked better as a slow movement from learning judo, wearing a scar as a disguise and taking it to the streets, then going full on Batman mental and taking on the mob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zeno Cosini		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2008-08-05-film-catch-up/#comment-32750</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zeno Cosini]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 07:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/index.php/2008-08-05-film-catch-up#comment-32750</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t love the Dark Knight. Too much exposition. I liked Heath Ledger a lot - he looked like a cross between Marlon Brando and Robert Smith. Maybe too much - I wanted him back on screen whenever he went away. I loved the sequence where he&#039;s taunting the cop about how many of his friends he&#039;s killed. 

Cillian Murphy&#039;s Scarecrow is still my favourite movie supervillain of recent times.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t love the Dark Knight. Too much exposition. I liked Heath Ledger a lot &#8211; he looked like a cross between Marlon Brando and Robert Smith. Maybe too much &#8211; I wanted him back on screen whenever he went away. I loved the sequence where he&#8217;s taunting the cop about how many of his friends he&#8217;s killed. </p>
<p>Cillian Murphy&#8217;s Scarecrow is still my favourite movie supervillain of recent times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason L		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2008-08-05-film-catch-up/#comment-32748</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 04:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/index.php/2008-08-05-film-catch-up#comment-32748</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oh come now. I know I got really pissed off by compulsion to recognise everyone in every arena when I was a kid. &#039;No, as a matter of fact I can&#039;t run very fast. I know it, you know it, everybody knows it, and everybody&#039;s fine with it including me, but don&#039;t you make me come up on stage to collect a medal for stepping across the starting line. You&#039;ve gone too far.&#039; &lt;a&gt;You don&#039;t have to be in the elite to be a cheerful elitist.&lt;/a&gt; Besides, the film ends with Dash learning to put harmony before competition anyway - hardly a reinforcement of that supposed thesis.

I&#039;m still waiting for my copy of &lt;i&gt;BBB&lt;/i&gt; to arrive and I&#039;m not sure why. Please let it have fewer musical numbers!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh come now. I know I got really pissed off by compulsion to recognise everyone in every arena when I was a kid. &#8216;No, as a matter of fact I can&#8217;t run very fast. I know it, you know it, everybody knows it, and everybody&#8217;s fine with it including me, but don&#8217;t you make me come up on stage to collect a medal for stepping across the starting line. You&#8217;ve gone too far.&#8217; <a>You don&#8217;t have to be in the elite to be a cheerful elitist.</a> Besides, the film ends with Dash learning to put harmony before competition anyway &#8211; hardly a reinforcement of that supposed thesis.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still waiting for my copy of <i>BBB</i> to arrive and I&#8217;m not sure why. Please let it have fewer musical numbers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hermes		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2008-08-05-film-catch-up/#comment-32747</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hermes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 03:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/index.php/2008-08-05-film-catch-up#comment-32747</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That was an excellent point about &#039;The Dark Knight&#039; lacking focus.  I enjoyed the film immensely but &#039;Batman Begins&#039; was a more engrossing film.  As great as his performance was it would seem Ledger&#039;s departure led to some questionable choices in the editing room.  The joker appears more often than intended in Nolan&#039;s original concept]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was an excellent point about &#8216;The Dark Knight&#8217; lacking focus.  I enjoyed the film immensely but &#8216;Batman Begins&#8217; was a more engrossing film.  As great as his performance was it would seem Ledger&#8217;s departure led to some questionable choices in the editing room.  The joker appears more often than intended in Nolan&#8217;s original concept</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mr. Brit		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2008-08-05-film-catch-up/#comment-32745</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Brit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 01:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/index.php/2008-08-05-film-catch-up#comment-32745</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Did you post this at 2 in the morning??]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you post this at 2 in the morning??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The_B		</title>
		<link>https://www.pentadact.com/2008-08-05-film-catch-up/#comment-32740</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The_B]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pentadact.com/index.php/2008-08-05-film-catch-up#comment-32740</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[FOR THE LOVE OF GOD do not go and see The Love Guru. It is an exercise in nothing more than childish humour which should entertain no one other than those who still giggle at the word &#039;penis&#039;.

Even the fact I didn&#039;t have to pay didn&#039;t help.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FOR THE LOVE OF GOD do not go and see The Love Guru. It is an exercise in nothing more than childish humour which should entertain no one other than those who still giggle at the word &#8216;penis&#8217;.</p>
<p>Even the fact I didn&#8217;t have to pay didn&#8217;t help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
