Comments on: New Ritual https://www.pentadact.com/2006-01-29-82/ We're back on a default theme because comments broke on my custom one and I don't have the energy to figure out why Sun, 04 Nov 2007 17:26:06 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1 By: Bobsy https://www.pentadact.com/2006-01-29-82/#comment-416 Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:20:56 +0000 http://www.kfj.f2s.com/index.php/2006-01-29-82#comment-416 See, this is the sort of discipline I don’t have. If I missed my goals of a month, I’d have the two drinks anyway, and a third to quieten the guilt.

]]> By: Jason L https://www.pentadact.com/2006-01-29-82/#comment-415 Thu, 02 Feb 2006 02:35:51 +0000 http://www.kfj.f2s.com/index.php/2006-01-29-82#comment-415 Wrong again – darn and sorry. Navs fixed – yay and thanks!

]]> By: Pentadact https://www.pentadact.com/2006-01-29-82/#comment-414 Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:12:03 +0000 http://www.kfj.f2s.com/index.php/2006-01-29-82#comment-414 But thanks for reminding me – I meant to change the category headings on the left to link to all posts in that category. Now they do.

]]> By: Pentadact https://www.pentadact.com/2006-01-29-82/#comment-413 Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:09:43 +0000 http://www.kfj.f2s.com/index.php/2006-01-29-82#comment-413 Okay, so you’re all talking about different nutso things about this site. The post Graham’s talking about, Jason, really was deleted. I knew I’d delete it when I wrote it, but I was drunk and couldn’t adequately justify not posting it to myself at the time. It wasn’t anything interesting, just an idle stream of Sorkinisms. You now have full permission to upload whatever wherever – it’s pretty clear I’m not going to get round to it myself. And as for old posts not being accessible except by trickery, that’s just because I can’t make archive pages work, and everyone complains if I put everything on one page.

]]> By: Graham https://www.pentadact.com/2006-01-29-82/#comment-412 Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:07:20 +0000 http://www.kfj.f2s.com/index.php/2006-01-29-82#comment-412 I was actually referring to a single post that originally followed the one we’re commenting on, but which no longer does.

I feel that I probably shouldn’t have drawn attention to it.

]]> By: Jason L https://www.pentadact.com/2006-01-29-82/#comment-411 Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:22:32 +0000 http://www.kfj.f2s.com/index.php/2006-01-29-82#comment-411 Actually if you’re tricksssy Tom hasn’t (yet) deleted anything per se – he’s just broken the site’s navigation so there are no links to some categories. Manually plugging the old values into the categoryname bit of the URL will still take you to the listings. For example, here is a link to all the TV shows/comments, not just the top four.

Unless you’re referring to Classic James, which I was fortunate enough to wget three days before it vanished and still haven’t gotten around to semi-with-permission mirroring. As soon as I have an X server again I’ll try to put it up and link.

]]> By: Graham https://www.pentadact.com/2006-01-29-82/#comment-410 Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:50:51 +0000 http://www.kfj.f2s.com/index.php/2006-01-29-82#comment-410 I was actually referring to the other post you made, but have since deleted. As far as I know the West Wing quote is accurate.

]]> By: Pentadact https://www.pentadact.com/2006-01-29-82/#comment-409 Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:10:24 +0000 http://www.kfj.f2s.com/index.php/2006-01-29-82#comment-409 Feel free to correct the quote if you remember it better.

]]> By: Graham https://www.pentadact.com/2006-01-29-82/#comment-408 Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:13:40 +0000 http://www.kfj.f2s.com/index.php/2006-01-29-82#comment-408 Revisionism! There’s revisionism going on here!

]]>