<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Order of the Phoenix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pentadact.com/2007-07-21-the-order-of-the-phoenix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pentadact.com/2007-07-21-the-order-of-the-phoenix/</link>
	<description>A games writer in the UK who also sometimes tries to make things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 16:03:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_B</title>
		<link>http://www.pentadact.com/2007-07-21-the-order-of-the-phoenix/#comment-19796</link>
		<dc:creator>The_B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kfj.f2s.com/index.php/2007-07-21-the-order-of-the-phoenix#comment-19796</guid>
		<description>A blog without negativity? That&#039;s unpossible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[A blog without negativity? That's unpossible!]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pentadact</title>
		<link>http://www.pentadact.com/2007-07-21-the-order-of-the-phoenix/#comment-19795</link>
		<dc:creator>Pentadact</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kfj.f2s.com/index.php/2007-07-21-the-order-of-the-phoenix#comment-19795</guid>
		<description>Huh. It can&#039;t have been as bad as I thought if it worked so well for you. Obviously my complaints relate to differences between book and film, but I&#039;m not fussy about how closely the two match up, I just want both to be good in the same way. The books let you live a little there, I didn&#039;t feel like I got that here. Interesting that you did.

It didn&#039;t occur to me until after I posted this that it&#039;s obscenely against the James prime directive: no negativity. I&#039;m tempted to delete it, but I really like that picture of Gerry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[Huh. It can't have been as bad as I thought if it worked so well for you. Obviously my complaints relate to differences between book and film, but I'm not fussy about how closely the two match up, I just want both to be good in the same way. The books let you live a little there, I didn't feel like I got that here. Interesting that you did.<br />
<br />
It didn't occur to me until after I posted this that it's obscenely against the James prime directive: no negativity. I'm tempted to delete it, but I really like that picture of Gerry.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.pentadact.com/2007-07-21-the-order-of-the-phoenix/#comment-19794</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kfj.f2s.com/index.php/2007-07-21-the-order-of-the-phoenix#comment-19794</guid>
		<description>I agree with Tom Camfield, and I&#039;ve read the source material. There are some things I wish were there. I want Tonks to have had more time, and the revelation about Harry&#039;s father being a dick should have been a bigger deal. But I thought it worked well as a movie, if a little rushed.

Perhaps it helps that I&#039;ve forgotten quite a lot of the specifics about the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[I agree with Tom Camfield, and I've read the source material. There are some things I wish were there. I want Tonks to have had more time, and the revelation about Harry's father being a dick should have been a bigger deal. But I thought it worked well as a movie, if a little rushed.<br />
<br />
Perhaps it helps that I've forgotten quite a lot of the specifics about the book.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Camfield</title>
		<link>http://www.pentadact.com/2007-07-21-the-order-of-the-phoenix/#comment-19777</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Camfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kfj.f2s.com/index.php/2007-07-21-the-order-of-the-phoenix#comment-19777</guid>
		<description>I thought it was surprisingly good, given I&#039;ve never read any book and only watched a bit of one previous film. I had a lot to do in understanding all the relationships, all the sub plots, and it wasn&#039;t dull because my brain was always making connections and seeing links. I thought it did a great job of hinting at the depth of the book, and creating a living breathing world that looked beyond the main characters and avoided stupid instances of elongated exposition. I think if it had just done the main story and missed the sub-plots I would have been bored senseless, because I hate most summer movies as they usually are so witlessly cut down so that no brain work is needed at all. Probably just a difference of knowing the source material or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[I thought it was surprisingly good, given I've never read any book and only watched a bit of one previous film. I had a lot to do in understanding all the relationships, all the sub plots, and it wasn't dull because my brain was always making connections and seeing links. I thought it did a great job of hinting at the depth of the book, and creating a living breathing world that looked beyond the main characters and avoided stupid instances of elongated exposition. I think if it had just done the main story and missed the sub-plots I would have been bored senseless, because I hate most summer movies as they usually are so witlessly cut down so that no brain work is needed at all. Probably just a difference of knowing the source material or not.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

